SUSPENSION OF OFFICER INVOLVED
IN FATAL TRAFFIC COLLISION OVERTURNED

On November 15, 1997, Alhambra Police Officer Keith Eggleston, while in route to back-up another officer, collided with a pedestrian crossing the street. As a result of the collision, the pedestrian received fatal injuries. Multiple investigations took place as a result of the traffic accident, including a criminal investigation by the California Highway Patrol, the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office, and administrative investigations by the Department of Motor Vehicles, as well as Eggleston’s employer, the Alhambra Police Department.

The first action taken against Eggleston, in what was to be a two-year ordeal, was instituted by DMV. DMV notified Eggleston of their intent to revoke his driver’s license as a result of alleged negligence in the traffic collision. A hearing was held with DMV in which the Revocation Order was overturned. Evidence was presented to the hearing officer, including photographs, accident statistics, and testimony from the investigating CHP officer and Eggleston. Eggleston testified that he did not see the pedestrian until it was too late to avoid a collision, in part due to poor lighting conditions and his view being obstructed by other vehicles. The CHP officer, as a result of the evidence and testimony he observed at the hearing, testified his conclusions in the report should be changed.

The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office declined to file any charges against Eggleston in the matter, citing that the evidence was not clear that the fault of the collision did not belong to the pedestrian. Eighteen months after the collision, Alhambra’s chief of police, Leon Burrus, decided to impose a three-week suspension against Eggleston as a result of the collision. A pre-disciplinary hearing (Skelly) was held with the chief of police. Eggleston, represented by Dieter Dammeier, of Lackie & Dammeier LLP, was able to convince the chief to reduce the suspension to a nine day suspension, setting the stage for a civil service hearing with the Alhambra Civil Service Commission.

Due to the length of time it took for the chief of police to impose discipline, the Civil Service Hearing did not commence until exactly two years from the date of the collision (the one year statute of limitation in POBR was not effective on the date of this collision). Eggleston, again represented by Dammeier, vigorously defended his actions in the traffic collision before the Civil Service Commission. The department, in an effort to prove Eggleston’s negligence, introduced the CHP report which initially found Eggleston at fault in the collision. The CHP officer’s conclusions in that report was based on two independent witness statements provided at the scene. Dammeier in contesting the findings of that report, introduced contradictory testimony from the two witnesses which was given in the civil lawsuit filed by the collision victim’s family. By introducing this contradictory evidence, it was established that the pedestrian was not inside of the cross-walk and was running across the street in the path of oncoming traffic. The CHP officer who, after learning of the witnesses new versions (given under oath), testified that if he had been aware of those versions the night of the collision, he would not have found Eggleston at fault and would have placed the fault on the pedestrian.

Eggleston testified that he had no view of the pedestrian until the second of the impact. The pedestrian ran into his path and there was nothing that could be done to avoid the collision on his part. The city, in a final effort to establish negligence, attempted to establish that Eggleston was speeding, however, the captain who initially recommended discipline, under cross-examination, ultimately admitted that Eggleston was traveling at a "reasonable speed".

Finally, Dammeier argued that while the result of the incident was tragic, which was the apparent reason the department felt it necessary to impose severe discipline, the collision was not Eggleston’s fault. The Alhambra Civil Service Commission agreed and overturned the nine-day suspension.


LDF Home Page | News Article Index

  Email Legal Defense Fund

Top of Page

Copyright © 2000 by Legal Defense Fund