Seiu v. Superior Court (June 20, 2001)

* court: California Appellate

* public agency: Orange County Superior court

* intervener: Orange County Employees Association

* issue: Employer-employee relations ordinance, decertification rules, reasonableness of rules

SEIU Facts

The Orange County Superior Court has 1,300 employees. 

* The Orange County Employees Association (OCEA) has since 1989 been the recognized employee organization for the court’s employees. 

* Prior to 1987, the County of Orange (not the courts) had an employee relations ordinance applicable to court employees which required decertification petitions to have signatures from 30% in the bargaining unit, with these signatures obtained within 90 days of submitted the petition. 

* In July 1984, the time period for collecting signatures for a decertification petition was reduced from 90 to 30 days. 

* In February 1990, OCEA’s assistant general manager contacted the county’s chief of employee relations, and they agreed on (and the Board of Supervisors in May 1990 adopted) a rule requiring 50% of employees to sign a decertification petition before it would be considered. 

* In 1998, each court became responsible for labor relations with its employees.  The Orange County Superior Court adopted as its own rules the existing county employee relations rules, with the 50 percent/30-day requirement for decertification petitions. 

* SEIU in August 2000 submitted a decertification petition with less than 50% of bargaining unit signatures. 

* The court rejected the petition; SEIU filed a petition for writ of mandate with the appellate court.

* The appellate court ruled that the 50% signature requirement was unreasonable and therefore invalid.

SEIU Analysis

* The court’s decertification rules must be consistent with the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA). 

* The MMBA requires that employee relations rules be “reasonable”. 

* The 50% signature rule is unreasonable.  First, it is uncommon; most jurisdictions have 30%.  Second, its origin appears to have been to placate OCEA, rather than to further the right of employees to representation.  Third, the 50% signature requirement makes it at least as hard to simply file a petition as to decertify an incumbent employee organization, which is a result inconsistent with the employees’ right to be represented by unions of their choosing.

LDF Home Page | Case Decision Archive

  Email Legal Defense Fund

Top of Page

Copyright © 2000 by Legal Defense Fund